←back to thread

346 points Kye | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.002s | source
Show context
favflam ◴[] No.45016762[source]
This situation feels dumb. I feel like I am watching idiots cheer on someone doing parkor and that person getting his teeth smashed on a wall. Like, what is the point?
replies(6): >>45016813 #>>45016814 #>>45016833 #>>45016847 #>>45016851 #>>45017297 #
mullingitover ◴[] No.45016847[source]
"Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard."

- H. L. Mencken

replies(2): >>45016924 #>>45017479 #
uncircle ◴[] No.45016924[source]
"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter."

- Winston Churchill [disputed]

replies(1): >>45016993 #
coryrc ◴[] No.45016993[source]
What's your alternative?

I'm serious.

(Mine is multi-member ranked voting (NOT IRV)).

replies(3): >>45017082 #>>45017380 #>>45017410 #
zahlman ◴[] No.45017410[source]
"Democracy" is the form of government; you are speaking of voting systems, which are an implementation detail, and not in the same natural category. "Alternatives to democracy" are things like despotism, monarchy, communism, fascism etc.
replies(2): >>45017613 #>>45018543 #
1. nine_k ◴[] No.45017613{3}[source]
Aristocratic republics have been doing quite well for some time: Florence, Venice, Genoa in the Mediterranean, much of the Hanseatic league and places like Novgorod, and later the Dutch Republic, in the north.
replies(1): >>45025702 #
2. Gud ◴[] No.45025702[source]
well for whom?
replies(1): >>45031294 #
3. uncircle ◴[] No.45031294[source]
Reading between the lines of your question, I'll pre-empt you: nowhere, not even in our so called democracies are the poor doing better than the rich and powerful.