←back to thread

688 points samwho | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
laurent_du ◴[] No.45017202[source]
Beautiful article but that's not what big O means. The author seems to be describing something that is usually called (upper case) Theta. Big O is an upper bound.
replies(2): >>45017463 #>>45017525 #
1. forrestthewoods ◴[] No.45017463[source]
This “well ackchyually“ is not particularly helpful. You’re not wrong. But this argument was lost 30 years ago. The programming field has been using “Big O” loosely.
replies(1): >>45024157 #
2. windward ◴[] No.45024157[source]
I've had conversations at work where the difference was important. Mass adoption of quicksort implies I'm not the only one.