←back to thread

361 points gloxkiqcza | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
numpy-thagoras ◴[] No.45015974[source]
This is the first time in a long time on Hacker News that I've not seen universal disapproval to this measure. People are actually arguing for it, even as a devil's advocate? What the UK has been doing is wrong, it is disenfranchising and disempowering people.

The UK is not a democratic or even liberty-focused state anymore. It's always been ruled by a crowd of people who went to privately-funded schools that cost a fortune. Half the government's politicians and staffers can trace their relations back to the same historical personage.

They aren't afraid for their kids with these laws. They're afraid that this ossified, stunted system of power that's been built over 800 years will break, and they will be out of a job with pitchfork-wielding crowds chasing them out of London.

replies(9): >>45016128 #>>45016568 #>>45017113 #>>45017132 #>>45017545 #>>45017771 #>>45017857 #>>45019957 #>>45022812 #
1. ang_cire ◴[] No.45017113[source]
Clearly showcasing that the UK chose their target wisely. Use a disliked entity as the way in the door, and people will argue for it without realizing it's a trojan horse.
replies(1): >>45023777 #
2. account42 ◴[] No.45023777[source]
But "think about the children" has always been one of the tactics used to push this kind of legislation, along with "terrorism" and variants of the two. That doesn't explain why HN is now more willing to believe the ruse.
replies(1): >>45023998 #
3. ang_cire ◴[] No.45023998[source]
Because this isn't just a "think of the children" narrative, it's also a "don't you know 4chan has lots of bad people who you personally dislike" narrative.

I would surmise that while 90%+ of guys are porn users, a nearly negligible percent are current or former channers, and most only associate chan sites with fringe groups that took them over.