←back to thread

296 points jakub_g | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
Springtime ◴[] No.45011126[source]
Youtube says this was done for select Youtube Shorts as a denoising process. However most popular channels on Youtube, which seem to be the pool selected for this experiment, typically already have well lit and graded videos shouldn't benefit much from extra denoising from a visual point of view.

It's true though that aggressive denoising gives things an artificially generated look since both processes use denoising heavily.

Perhaps this was done to optimize video encoding, since the less noise/surface detail there is the easier it is to compress.

replies(3): >>45011162 #>>45011186 #>>45011544 #
alex1138 ◴[] No.45011186[source]
Can I just start a petition to remove Shorts entirely?
replies(4): >>45011216 #>>45011287 #>>45012294 #>>45014248 #
artninja1988 ◴[] No.45011216[source]
Just don't watch them?
replies(4): >>45011252 #>>45011289 #>>45011478 #>>45016362 #
1. alex1138 ◴[] No.45016362{3}[source]
This is a very common response where users acquiesce to an internet of mediocrity rather than demanding the corporations do better

I mostly don't watch them. But they literally spam every single search. (While we're at it, Youtube also isn't very good at honoring keywords in searches either)