←back to thread

335 points aspenmayer | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
srvo ◴[] No.45008850[source]
The problem here isn't that the government gets involved in businesses. That has always been something they do.

The problem is that these days they do it capriciously, without any sort of plan or intention.

The government played a foundational role in supporting the early stage research that enabled companies like Intel to emerge. Underwriting that sort of long-term investment that wouldn't easily attract commercial capital is a great place for them to be.

Meanwhile, is it even the case that the American chip industry is declining? Apple, Nvidia, and Google all have significant chip manufacturing operations. And this isn't an industry I even follow particularly closesly.

replies(4): >>45009433 #>>45009577 #>>45010141 #>>45015032 #
petralithic ◴[] No.45010141[source]
Which American companies manufacture chips on the latest node? Certainly not Texas Instruments, Global Foundries and one might even argue Intel, compared to Samsung and TSMC. It is a matter of national security that Intel not fail.
replies(2): >>45011482 #>>45014423 #
1. SirMaster ◴[] No.45014423[source]
What government or military things use anywhere near the latest node chips though? I thought all that stuff usually uses really old chips, because that stuff only changes like once every couple decades.
replies(1): >>45015521 #
2. petralithic ◴[] No.45015521[source]
The government wants to build AI data centers and I'd assume they're not using decades old nodes to do so. There is always a use case and therefore national security interest for the latest nodes.