←back to thread

YouTube made AI enhancements to videos without warning or permission

(www.bbc.com)
296 points jakub_g | 2 comments | 24 Aug 25 10:37 UTC | HN request time: 0.211s | source
Show context
hliyan ◴[25 Aug 25 11:37 UTC] No.45012749[source]▶
A chill ran down my spine as I imagined this being applied to the written word online: my articles being automatically "corrected" or "improved" the moment I hit publish, any book manuscripts being sent to editors being similarly "polished" to a point that we humans start to lose our unique tone and everything we read falls into that strange uncanny valley where everything reads ok, you can't quite put your finger on it, but it feels like something is wearing the skin of what you wrote as a face.
replies(12): >>45012940 #>>45013081 #>>45013106 #>>45013184 #>>45013226 #>>45013285 #>>45013423 #>>45013918 #>>45014061 #>>45014113 #>>45015666 #>>45022301 #
dsign ◴[25 Aug 25 12:27 UTC] No.45013106[source]▶
The well is already poisoned. I'm refraining from hiring editors merely because I suspect there's a high chance they'll just use an LLM. All recent books I'm reading is with suspicion that they have been written by AI.

However, polished to a point that we humans start to lose our unique tone is what style guides that go into the minutiae of comma placement try do do. And I'm currently reading a book I'm 100% sure has been edited by an expert human editor that did quite the job of taking away all the uniqueness of the work. So, we can't just blame the LLMs for making things more gray when we have historically paid other people to do it.

replies(5): >>45013425 #>>45013545 #>>45013762 #>>45015526 #>>45016348 #
1. jimbo808 ◴[25 Aug 25 13:18 UTC] No.45013545[source]▶
> suspicion that they have been written by AI

"By AI" or "with AI?" If I write the book and have AI proof read things as I go, or critique my ideas, or point out which points do I need to add more support for, is that written "by AI?"

When Big Corp says 30% of their code is now written "by AI," did they write the code by following thoughtful instruction from a human expert, who interpeted the work to be done, made decisions about the architectural impact, outlined those things and gave detailed instructions that the LLM could execute in small chunks?

This distinction I feel is going to become more important. AI tools are useful, and most people are using them for writing code, literature, papers, etc. I feel like, in some cases, it is not fair to say the thing was written by AI, even when sometimes it technically was.

replies(2): >>45014140 #>>45014610 #
2. BenjiWiebe ◴[25 Aug 25 14:59 UTC] No.45014610[source]▶
Good point. I've read books with minor mistakes that slipped past the editor. Not a big deal, but it takes me out of the flow when reading. And they're things that I think an AI could easily catch.