←back to thread

808 points shaunpud | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.417s | source
Show context
mrtksn ◴[] No.45003438[source]
Traditionally in the west, censorship was through copyright rights. It wasn’t considered censorship if you do it for money and business.

Fast forward to today, Americans are pushing you for self censorship through force and denial(if you don’t speak in line with the admin, you will have hard time in your US public sector job or if you want to travel to US) and Europeans find all kind of other ways.

Tough new world order. I used to be advocating for resolution through legal/political means, but now I'm inclined to believe that the solution must be technological because everybody wants security and control. Nobody wants loose ends. Everyone is terrified of some group of people will do something to them, freedom is out of fashion and those claiming otherwise want freedom for themselves only. The guy who says want to make humans interplanetary species is posing with people detained for traveling on the planet without permission. Just forget about it.

So this website itself is about censorship, therefore people interested in this shouldn’t be using websites. New tools are needed, the mainstream will be controlled the way the local hegemony sees it fit.

replies(11): >>45003665 #>>45003694 #>>45003703 #>>45003707 #>>45003817 #>>45003837 #>>45003945 #>>45003970 #>>45003991 #>>45004290 #>>45008332 #
tomp[dead post] ◴[] No.45003991[source]
[flagged]
CyberDildonics ◴[] No.45004090[source]
Calling someone who buys a platform and amplifies nazis, white nationalists and groups while sequestering marginalized groups of people free speech is basically 1984 double speak.

Calling people from other countries "savages from primitive cultures" is textbook hardcore racism.

replies(1): >>45004122 #
tomp[dead post] ◴[] No.45004122[source]
[flagged]
CyberDildonics ◴[] No.45004208[source]
These two comments are basically verbatim textbook lines from what white supremacists say as well as people who champion separating races and encourage racially segregated states.
replies(2): >>45004438 #>>45012807 #
1. account42 ◴[] No.45012807[source]
This is not an argument.
replies(1): >>45013073 #
2. CyberDildonics ◴[] No.45013073[source]
Which part of that do you think deserves an argument?