←back to thread

296 points jakub_g | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.445s | source
Show context
jszymborski ◴[] No.45003810[source]
So I feel like article doesn't address the "why" of it all. Why auto AI upscale?
replies(7): >>45004133 #>>45005376 #>>45011140 #>>45011207 #>>45011286 #>>45011756 #>>45013503 #
therein ◴[] No.45011207[source]
To make people more accustomed to the AI generated look so that when they release their next Veo integration to YouTube content creator tools, these videos will stand out less as unnatural.
replies(3): >>45011621 #>>45012310 #>>45017279 #
1. Maken ◴[] No.45012310[source]
Sadly, this is a real possibility. I would even conjecture they are testing a new pipeline, in which the input is real videos and the output are AI-generated.

For now it's a kind of autoencoding, regenerating the same input video with minimal changes. They will refine the pipeline until the end video is indistinguishable from the original. Then, once that is perfected, they will offer famous content creators the chance to sell their "image" to other creators, so less popular underpaid creators can record videos and change their appearance to those of famous ones, making each content creator a brand to be sold. Eventually humans will get out of the pipeline and everything will be autogenerated, of course.

replies(1): >>45012455 #
2. artemisart ◴[] No.45012455[source]
> Then, once that is perfected, they will offer famous content creators the chance to sell their "image" to other creators, so less popular underpaid creators can record videos and change their appearance to those of famous ones, making each content creator a brand to be sold.

I'm frightened by how realistic this sounds.