←back to thread

Ban me at the IP level if you don't like me

(boston.conman.org)
597 points classichasclass | 1 comments | 25 Aug 25 04:23 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
Etheryte ◴[25 Aug 25 05:39 UTC] No.45010574[source]▶
One starts to wonder, at what point might it be actually feasible to do it the other way around, by whitelisting IP ranges. I could see this happening as a community effort, similar to adblocker list curation etc.
replies(9): >>45010597 #>>45010603 #>>45010604 #>>45010611 #>>45010624 #>>45010757 #>>45010872 #>>45010910 #>>45010935 #
plaguna[dead post] ◴[25 Aug 25 05:45 UTC] No.45010603[source]▶
[flagged]
dokyun ◴[25 Aug 25 05:50 UTC] No.45010622[source]▶
Who cares?
replies(1): >>45010629 #
plaguna ◴[25 Aug 25 05:51 UTC] No.45010629{3}[source]▶
Same people who care about “master” and “main” for hit branches.
replies(5): >>45010729 #>>45010749 #>>45010799 #>>45012276 #>>45018158 #
McDyver ◴[25 Aug 25 06:21 UTC] No.45010799{4}[source]▶
Would those people care about the word "hit"?
replies(1): >>45011877 #
1. aspenmayer ◴[25 Aug 25 09:17 UTC] No.45011877{5}[source]▶
I think it’s a typo, as I think the context is “git branches” unless you think that “hit branches” makes sense in context. I don’t think it does.