←back to thread

Ban me at the IP level if you don't like me

(boston.conman.org)
597 points classichasclass | 4 comments | 25 Aug 25 04:23 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
Etheryte ◴[25 Aug 25 05:39 UTC] No.45010574[source]▶
One starts to wonder, at what point might it be actually feasible to do it the other way around, by whitelisting IP ranges. I could see this happening as a community effort, similar to adblocker list curation etc.
replies(9): >>45010597 #>>45010603 #>>45010604 #>>45010611 #>>45010624 #>>45010757 #>>45010872 #>>45010910 #>>45010935 #
plaguna[dead post] ◴[25 Aug 25 05:45 UTC] No.45010603[source]▶
[flagged]
anonfordays[dead post] ◴[25 Aug 25 05:50 UTC] No.45010626[source]▶
[flagged]
plaguna[dead post] ◴[25 Aug 25 05:53 UTC] No.45010642[source]▶
[flagged]
1. JoshTriplett ◴[25 Aug 25 05:56 UTC] No.45010666[source]▶
Not to mention more descriptive. If you hear the term "allowlist" or "denylist" it is immediately obvious and self-explanatory, with no prior context needed.

Leaving aside any other reasons, they're just better names.

replies(1): >>45010713 #
2. montag ◴[25 Aug 25 06:05 UTC] No.45010713[source]▶
And while you're at it, start speaking Esperanto, use the metric system, and switch to a Dvorak keyboard.
replies(2): >>45011285 #>>45011599 #
3. zipliners ◴[25 Aug 25 07:35 UTC] No.45011285[source]▶
No yes no. As for the post you replied to, allow/deny are indeed the more descriptive terms for lists that allow/deny access. Descriptive terms are good and useful.
4. Ekaros ◴[25 Aug 25 08:32 UTC] No.45011599[source]▶
Is Dvorak optimized for Esperanto?