←back to thread

358 points maloga | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.222s | source
Show context
danjl ◴[] No.45005657[source]
The LLM started with a three month headstart, both in terms of code, using the previous game as a template, and more importantly, all of the learnings and mistakes you made in the hand-coded pass.
replies(4): >>45005731 #>>45006290 #>>45006581 #>>45007911 #
AIPedant ◴[] No.45006581[source]
Yeah, I figured this was clickbait but my jaw still dropped a bit when I saw this:

  I cloned the backend for Truco and gave Claude a long prompt explaining the rules of Escoba and asking it to refactor the code to implement it.
How long would it take the human dev to refactor the code themselves? I think it's plausible that it would be longer than 3 days, but maybe not!
replies(2): >>45006919 #>>45007521 #
dingnuts ◴[] No.45007521[source]
As an LLM hater, I have to say, this is exactly the use case I want code generation for. If I need to figure out the problem as I develop, which is the case for new code, the model can kindly get out of my way. But if I have already written a bunch of code and I can explain the problem with the understanding that I've gained from my implementation and have the bot redo the grunt work? fine with me..
replies(1): >>45008314 #
1. GaggiX ◴[] No.45008314[source]
>As an LLM hater

I thought this was the start of a joke or something, I guess if you use LLMs you are a "LLM lover" then.