←back to thread

361 points gloxkiqcza | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
hungmung ◴[] No.45006064[source]
More made up problems for a fundamentally inept government to solve because fixing real problems like a broken healthcare system is hard and not a guaranteed political win.

Thanks Starmer, you're a worthless turd and no different than your predecessor.

replies(6): >>45006181 #>>45006484 #>>45007240 #>>45007801 #>>45007859 #>>45008041 #
basisword ◴[] No.45006181[source]
The Online Safety Act was passed when the Tories were still in government.

Rolling that back essentially makes you a prime minister that believes children should have unfettered access to porn, self-harm material, gore, and that the outspoken parents of kids who've killed themselves after accessing this material shouldn't be listened to. At least, that's how the media (on all sides) would spin it. Not really a fight worth picking.

replies(4): >>45006238 #>>45006471 #>>45006495 #>>45006587 #
YurgenJurgensen ◴[] No.45006238[source]
That’s populist talk, and if the PM wants to play populism, he’s not doing a very good job of it.
replies(2): >>45006288 #>>45006526 #
basisword ◴[] No.45006288{3}[source]
The problem the majority of people have with this law is "I can't easily access my free porn anymore". The counter-argument is "child kills self"[1] because shitty tech companies can't control their thirst for money. Like I said, I don't agree with the legislation but it's not an easy argument to make.

[1] https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-62998484

replies(1): >>45006441 #
cm2187 ◴[] No.45006441{4}[source]
In a world where you can cast your vote anonymously in the voting booth, it’s a dangerous game to piss off a large number of voters, even if they can’t admit publicly why. They will be reminded every day of that idiotic policy. Like cookie consent banners.
replies(1): >>45007135 #
1. afavour ◴[] No.45007135{5}[source]
I think you’re correct and the person you’re replying to is correct too.

Voters aren’t all that rational. They could choose to vote against the person that blocked their access to porn but also choose to vote against the person who made porn available again because doing so puts children in danger or whatever the scaremongering line would be.