←back to thread

Show HN: Bicyclopedia

(bicyclopedia.lemoing.ca)
123 points lemoing | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source

Hey folks!

A bit of background: I'm a software engineer by trade, but I'm currently on sabbatical doing a year-long working holiday in Australia. I love riding bikes but only had the most beginner-level knowledge of them before I found a job at a bike shop. This was a fun personal project to try to capture some of what I've learned so far, targeted at fellow beginners. It's going to be incomplete/lacking if you already have some bike knowledge, but I hope you all enjoyed it all the same.

Please keep the feedback coming; it's late in Australia, but I want to make sure the bike info is at least accurate, if not comprehensive!

1. im_down_w_otp ◴[] No.45005279[source]
The Bicyclopedia seems to think that the frame is the most expensive part of the bicycle.

The infernal suspension forks on 3 out of 4 of the bikes in my garage would beg to differ, both in upfront cost and ongoing maintenance.

replies(1): >>45005601 #
2. loloquwowndueo ◴[] No.45005601[source]
A non-suspension fork is ok for 95% of people and likely cheaper than a matching frame, less material and a simpler shape.

Also - my suspension fork is 20 years old, has never had maintenance and is working fine. What do you do to yours? :)

(Or maybe my fork is NOT fine and I just don’t know it…)

replies(1): >>45009058 #
3. mc3301 ◴[] No.45009058[source]
A fairly common story for people with a fork that has never had maintenance:

1. "It works fine" 2. Get a shop to rebuild it for a surprisingly low fee 3. "Holy smokes, I had no idea my fork could be this good!"

Basically, a quick rebuild (yourself or a shop) is definitely worth it.