←back to thread

469 points samuelstros | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.2s | source
Show context
brokegrammer ◴[] No.45001678[source]
I don't get it. The title says "What makes Claude Code so damn good", which implies that they will show how Claude Code is better than other tools, or just better in general. But they go about repeating the Claude Code documentation using different wording.

Am I missing something here? Or is this just Anthropic shilling?

replies(5): >>45001719 #>>45001947 #>>45003495 #>>45003706 #>>45009343 #
dtagames ◴[] No.45003706[source]
The difference between Claude Code and Cursor is that one is a command line tool and the other an IDE. You can use Claude models in both and all these techniques can be applied with Cursor and its rules, too.

It's Coke vs. Pepsi.

replies(3): >>45004402 #>>45004533 #>>45004641 #
1. willsmith72 ◴[] No.45004533[source]
not at all, it's just not a "claude model". All these companies add their own prompts hints on top. it's a totally different experience. Trying using kiro which is also a "claude model" and tell me it's the same