(minusx.ai)

469 points samuelstros | 1 comments | 23 Aug 25 19:07 UTC | HN request time: 0.201s | source

Show context

brokegrammer ◴[24 Aug 25 05:36 UTC] No.45001678[source]▶

I don't get it. The title says "What makes Claude Code so damn good", which implies that they will show how Claude Code is better than other tools, or just better in general. But they go about repeating the Claude Code documentation using different wording.

Am I missing something here? Or is this just Anthropic shilling?

replies(5): >>45001719 #>>45001947 #>>45003495 #>>45003706 #>>45009343 #

slimebot80 ◴[24 Aug 25 11:46 UTC] No.45003495[source]▶

>>45001678 #

Nowhere in the title does it compare to other tools? Just that's it's damn good.

replies(2): >>45003584 #>>45004383 #

1. patates ◴[24 Aug 25 14:12 UTC] No.45004383[source]▶

>>45003495 #

not in the title but, one of the opening sentences is this:

> I find Claude Code objectively less annoying to use compared to Cursor, or Github Copilot agents even with the same underlying model! What makes it so damn good?

↑