←back to thread

360 points danielmorozoff | 5 comments | | HN request time: 0.215s | source
1. idiomat9000 ◴[] No.45004041[source]
I did not see any breakthroughs in neural link patents. Have they solved neural scaring?
replies(4): >>45029310 #>>45029312 #>>45030348 #>>45032171 #
2. ceedan ◴[] No.45029310[source]
Not sure but they did manage to make the patients say that it had changed their lives. :smirk:
3. csours ◴[] No.45029312[source]
Trade secrets?
4. natosaichek ◴[] No.45030348[source]
There are flexible electrodes, rather than rigid arrays. The idea was that this would reduce scarring. I'm not aware of the exact results of the trials, but it works better than rigid arrays for longevity of recording.
5. ACCount37 ◴[] No.45032171[source]
This appears to be at least a partial solve for it.

Older implants are notorious for having that issue - and while scarring doesn't appear to hurt the brain all that much, it sure does hurt the connectivity.

The usual "bed of nails" Utah array typically deteriorates massively within 6 months. Neuralink's very first human implant has lasted for what, a year and a half already? It had issues with dislodged electrodes, which must have hurt the interface quality, but it still remains usable. That's a damn good sign.