←back to thread

808 points shaunpud | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
ulrischa ◴[] No.45003303[source]
[flagged]
replies(14): >>45003337 #>>45003374 #>>45003410 #>>45003499 #>>45003518 #>>45003524 #>>45003575 #>>45003629 #>>45003661 #>>45003806 #>>45003857 #>>45003931 #>>45004178 #>>45004483 #
riedel ◴[] No.45003524[source]
The legal basis is explained here [0] . Funny thing is that in contrast to what the OP says the German net agency says that the CUII needs a court decision:

>A rights holder represented in the CUII can find copyright infringements and then file a lawsuit with the court for the implementation of a DNS block. If the court decides that a DNS block is lawful, this block is implemented by the Internet access providers organized in the CUII. The prerequisites for a blocking claim against the Internet access provider pursuant to § 8 DDG are met, - if a rights holder can prove his copyright, - his works are published on the Internet without his consent, - he has no other way of remedying the infringement, - if the blocking is reasonable and proportionate.

[0] https://www.bundesnetzagentur.de/DE/Fachthemen/Digitales/Sch...

replies(1): >>45003783 #
1. fabbbbb ◴[] No.45003783[source]
Since July that is, OP posts about it as well. This post is from February.
replies(1): >>45004146 #
2. riedel ◴[] No.45004146[source]
Great to hear! OP probably had some part in that. Just read the blog post [0]

[0] https://lina.sh/blog/cuii-gives-up