(minusx.ai)

469 points samuelstros | 1 comments | 23 Aug 25 19:07 UTC | HN request time: 0.001s | source

Show context

brokegrammer ◴[24 Aug 25 05:36 UTC] No.45001678[source]▶

I don't get it. The title says "What makes Claude Code so damn good", which implies that they will show how Claude Code is better than other tools, or just better in general. But they go about repeating the Claude Code documentation using different wording.

Am I missing something here? Or is this just Anthropic shilling?

replies(5): >>45001719 #>>45001947 #>>45003495 #>>45003706 #>>45009343 #

1. whazor ◴[24 Aug 25 06:47 UTC] No.45001947[source]▶

>>45001678 #

I think this article is targeted towards readers who subjectively agree that Claude Code is the best.

↑