←back to thread

What makes Claude Code so damn good

(minusx.ai)
469 points samuelstros | 3 comments | 23 Aug 25 19:07 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
LaGrange ◴[23 Aug 25 19:45 UTC] No.44998577[source]▶
[flagged]
replies(1): >>44998586 #
dang ◴[23 Aug 25 19:47 UTC] No.44998586[source]▶
Please don't post unsubstantive comments to Hacker News, and especially not putdowns.

The idea here is: if you have a substantive point, make it thoughtfully. If not, please don't comment until you do.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

replies(1): >>44998630 #
dingnuts ◴[23 Aug 25 19:54 UTC] No.44998630[source]▶
I appreciate the vague negative takes on tools like this where it feels like there is so much hype it's impossible to have a different opinion. "It's bad" is perfectly substantiative in my opinion; this person tried it, didn't like it, and doesn't have much more to say because of that, but it's still a useful perspective.

Is this why HN is so dang pro-AI? the negative comments, even small ones, are moderated away? explains a lot TBH

replies(4): >>44998666 #>>44998830 #>>44998859 #>>45000537 #
1. dang ◴[24 Aug 25 01:34 UTC] No.45000537[source]▶
HN is by no means "pro-AI". It's sharply divided, and (as always with these things) each side assumes the other side is dominant.
replies(1): >>45003589 #
2. FergusArgyll ◴[24 Aug 25 12:04 UTC] No.45003589[source]▶
"After viewing identical samples of major network television coverage of the Beirut massacre, both pro-Israeli and pro-Arab partisans rated these programs, and those responsible for them, as being biased against their side."

https://users.ssc.wisc.edu/~jpiliavi/965/hwang.pdf

replies(1): >>45007246 #
3. ◴[24 Aug 25 19:59 UTC] No.45007246[source]▶