←back to thread

What makes Claude Code so damn good

(minusx.ai)
469 points samuelstros | 1 comments | 23 Aug 25 19:07 UTC | HN request time: 0.328s | source
Show context
syntaxing ◴[23 Aug 25 20:00 UTC] No.44998675[source]▶
I don’t know if I’m doing something wrong. I was using Sonnet 4 with GitHub Copilot. Recently a week ago switched to Claude Code. I find GitHub Copilot solves problem and bugs way better than Claude Code. For some reason, Claude Code seems very lazy. Has anyone experience something similar?
replies(5): >>44998728 #>>44998732 #>>44998821 #>>44998958 #>>45001414 #
1. wordofx ◴[23 Aug 25 20:39 UTC] No.44998958[source]▶
I have most of the tools setup so I can switch between them and test which is better. So far Amp and Claude Code are on top. GH Copilot is the worst. I know MS is desperately trying to copy its competitors but the reality is, they are just copying features. They haven’t solved the system prompts. So the outcomes are just inferior.