←back to thread

469 points samuelstros | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.201s | source
Show context
LaGrange ◴[] No.44998577[source]
[flagged]
replies(1): >>44998586 #
dang ◴[] No.44998586[source]
Please don't post unsubstantive comments to Hacker News, and especially not putdowns.

The idea here is: if you have a substantive point, make it thoughtfully. If not, please don't comment until you do.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

replies(1): >>44998630 #
dingnuts ◴[] No.44998630[source]
I appreciate the vague negative takes on tools like this where it feels like there is so much hype it's impossible to have a different opinion. "It's bad" is perfectly substantiative in my opinion; this person tried it, didn't like it, and doesn't have much more to say because of that, but it's still a useful perspective.

Is this why HN is so dang pro-AI? the negative comments, even small ones, are moderated away? explains a lot TBH

replies(4): >>44998666 #>>44998830 #>>44998859 #>>45000537 #
1. exe34 ◴[] No.44998830[source]
that wasn't a negative comment though. a negative comment would explain what they didn't like about it. this was the digital equivalent of flytipping.