←back to thread

469 points samuelstros | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
dingnuts[dead post] ◴[] No.44998611[source]
[flagged]
ebzlo ◴[] No.44998638[source]
Yes technically it is RAG, but a lot of the community is associating RAG with vector search specifically.
replies(1): >>44998673 #
1. dingnuts ◴[] No.44998673[source]
it does? why? the term RAG as I understand it leaves the methodology for retrieval vague so that different techniques can be used depending on the, er, context.. which makes a lot more sense to me
replies(1): >>44998795 #
2. koakuma-chan ◴[] No.44998795[source]
> why?

Hype. There's nothing wrong with using, e.g., full-text search for RAG.