←back to thread

Leaving Gmail for Mailbox.org

(giuliomagnifico.blog)
351 points giuliomagnifico | 3 comments | 22 Aug 25 17:41 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
rendleflag ◴[22 Aug 25 22:09 UTC] No.44990465[source]▶
I’ve been a Fastmail user for years, having left Gmail. It works great and have nothing be but praise for them. I use my own domain with them so if I decide to leave it’s not an issue worrying about updating people with my new email.
replies(8): >>44990488 #>>44990503 #>>44990569 #>>44991784 #>>44991808 #>>44991862 #>>44993040 #>>45002006 #
onlyhumans ◴[22 Aug 25 22:20 UTC] No.44990569[source]▶
Fastmail is kind of a weird service. If you stop paying they release your email for someone else to take over. Pretty unacceptable this day and age.
replies(17): >>44990650 #>>44990739 #>>44990862 #>>44990864 #>>44991044 #>>44991145 #>>44991228 #>>44991935 #>>44992176 #>>44992288 #>>44992462 #>>44992472 #>>44992746 #>>44992791 #>>44993279 #>>44995278 #>>44995933 #
akoboldfrying ◴[23 Aug 25 01:04 UTC] No.44991935[source]▶
Domain names work the same way -- once you stop paying for it, someone else can buy and use it.

Do you have the same problem with domain names? If so, how would you propose to fix it?

replies(1): >>44992054 #
soraminazuki ◴[23 Aug 25 01:21 UTC] No.44992054[source]▶
That's incredibly dishonest reasoning. Are you seriously telling me that unless people have a solution for fixing DNS, commercial email should be free to hand out used email addresses? Seriously?
replies(2): >>44992170 #>>44993373 #
akoboldfrying ◴[23 Aug 25 05:13 UTC] No.44993373[source]▶
Sure.

Now that you've said what you wanted to say about how dishonest the question is, would you like to either answer it or explain why the analogy fails to hold?

replies(2): >>44994086 #>>45000973 #
1. soraminazuki ◴[23 Aug 25 07:39 UTC] No.44994086[source]▶
Are you the type of person who thinks it's okay to dump garbage on your neighbor's lawn because governments haven't been successful at stopping pollution? Because that's the extract same rhetoric you're using.
replies(1): >>44994206 #
2. akoboldfrying ◴[23 Aug 25 08:02 UTC] No.44994206[source]▶
It's OK that you don't want to answer the question.
replies(1): >>44994769 #
3. soraminazuki ◴[23 Aug 25 10:01 UTC] No.44994769[source]▶
It's okay that you can't comprehend a straightforward answer.
replies(1): >>44998990 #