←back to thread

607 points givemeethekeys | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.325s | source
Show context
cuttothechase ◴[] No.44990065[source]
Genuine question-

How does Govt picking winners and losers going to help?

Intel is no Too big to fail Bank. Why save Intel of all chip manufacturers? Wouldnt it be like 25 years too late, with Intel and its heydays !?

Would Govt now ensure parity by investing in "marquee" entities across different industrial domains?

replies(20): >>44990113 #>>44990135 #>>44990144 #>>44990162 #>>44990212 #>>44990285 #>>44990292 #>>44990294 #>>44990525 #>>44990551 #>>44990715 #>>44990722 #>>44991025 #>>44991107 #>>44991139 #>>44991204 #>>44991545 #>>44992843 #>>44993129 #>>45014149 #
1. acomjean ◴[] No.44992843[source]
All I can think here is the government forcing back doors

(like the failed Clipper chip) https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clipper_chip

The thinking might be the government needs a local industry for security. Think submarine manufacturing. Not a huge private market for that, but best to keep local so the supply can’t be cut off.

Though usually the government isn’t the best stewards of companies. When I worked for a large government contractor someone joked “yesterday’s technology tomorrow”. Some of that is for reliability, but it wasn’t cutting edge in a lot of ways.