←back to thread

411 points donpott | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
nickdothutton ◴[] No.44983582[source]
Step 1, pass law.

Step 2, demand compliance.

Step 3, upon not hearing of compliance, levy fines.

Step 4, upon non payment of fines, declare in breach of (2).

Step 5, block site from UK using DNS, in the same manner as torrent sites etc.

5 was always the goal, 2 to 4 are largely just performative.

replies(13): >>44983768 #>>44983781 #>>44983897 #>>44984120 #>>44984248 #>>44985133 #>>44985729 #>>44985841 #>>44985859 #>>44986058 #>>44986633 #>>44988012 #>>44991247 #
sunshine-o ◴[] No.44984120[source]
This is the only power they have left.

The UK government has lost control of what happen in the physical world on their own island so now the bureaucrats play a fantasy game where they are gonna enforce their rules and dominion in their former colonies or the digital world.

replies(11): >>44985325 #>>44985367 #>>44985739 #>>44985860 #>>44986390 #>>44986462 #>>44986519 #>>44986980 #>>44988412 #>>44988528 #>>44991312 #
bko ◴[] No.44988528[source]
I heard things about UK arresting people for social media posts but thought it was just a few cases cherry picked. But I recently looked up the scale of arrests and it's really insane.

Police are arresting over 12,000 people each year for social media posts and other online communications deemed “grossly offensive,” “indecent,” “obscene,” or “menacing.” This averages to around 33 arrests per day.

These arrests are primarily made under Section 127 of the Communications Act 2003 and Section 1 of the Malicious Communications Act 1988, laws which criminalize causing “annoyance,” “inconvenience,” or “anxiety” to others through digital messages.

Utterly insane.

https://nypost.com/2025/08/19/world-news/uk-free-speech-stru...

replies(4): >>44988616 #>>44988897 #>>44989516 #>>44989543 #
foldr ◴[] No.44989516[source]
The flip side of this is that convictions under the Communications Act have gone down compared to 2010, so it's a mixed picture:

https://lordslibrary.parliament.uk/select-communications-off...

It is hard to get good data on this, but it is probably a combination of overzealous policing (which is indeed bad) and an increase in arrests for behavior that arguably is a police matter, such as domestic abuse, harassment, etc. I would not be surprised to discover that there is more online harassment now than there was in 2010.

replies(1): >>44990740 #
KETHERCORTEX ◴[] No.44990740[source]
> I would not be surprised to discover that there is more online harassment now than there was in 2010.

There is simply more people online now than in 2010.

replies(1): >>44991128 #
1. foldr ◴[] No.44991128[source]
That's a good point! The growth in arrests shown in the article I linked starts in 2017, though. I think internet usage has gone up significantly by some measures since 2017, but whether or not that's sufficient to explain the increase in arrests, I am not sure.