←back to thread

597 points achristmascarl | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
fsaid ◴[] No.44987720[source]
Waymo should add a thin layer of "assertiveness" for actual deadlock that their self-driving architecture could cause.

While in Austin, I was in a Waymo that blocked 3 lanes of incoming traffic while attempting to merge into a lane going into the opposite direction. It was a super unorthodox move, but none of the drivers (even while stopped for a red light) would let the Waymo* merge into their lane.

Thank God for the tinted windows, people were pulling their phones out to record (rightly so). It felt like I was responsible for holding up a major portion of Austin 5 pm traffic on a Friday.

Wish it just asserted itself ever-so-slightly to get itself out.

replies(6): >>44987783 #>>44987836 #>>44987950 #>>44987976 #>>44988059 #>>44991671 #
dgs_sgd ◴[] No.44987836[source]
I think we're going to see more examples of this as Waymo's popularity grows. Basically human drivers taking advantage of Waymo's far more passive driving style. Maybe some rules of the road will have to change, or the Waymos will get dedicated lanes to solve this problem.
replies(1): >>44987883 #
freeone3000 ◴[] No.44987883[source]
Imagine if we had dedicated lanes for giant Waymos, that could hold dozens of people. The future of transport.
replies(6): >>44987902 #>>44987911 #>>44987933 #>>44988218 #>>44988831 #>>44995081 #
thfuran ◴[] No.44987933[source]
You need to think bigger. Once we have separate lanes just for the waymos, we don't need them to be regular roadways. We can scale up the waymo even more and size the lane exactly to the vehicle, maybe even radically redesign the road surface for lower rolling resistance. What a future it will be.
replies(4): >>44988587 #>>44988723 #>>44990735 #>>45026589 #
1. poemxo ◴[] No.44990735{4}[source]
We could even install metal rails into the ground to meet this rolling resistence requirement.