←back to thread

607 points givemeethekeys | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.421s | source
Show context
MyOutfitIsVague ◴[] No.44990202[source]
> the government made an $8.9 billion investment in Intel common stock, purchasing 433.3 million shares at a price of $20.47 per share, giving it a 10% stake in the company

> The United States paid nothing for these Shares, and the Shares are now valued at approximately $11 Billion Dollars

I don't understand. Can somebody explain to me how the government made an investement, bought shares, but paid nothing?

replies(6): >>44990265 #>>44990304 #>>44990311 #>>44990325 #>>44990454 #>>44990908 #
cvoss ◴[] No.44990304[source]
The answer is in the paragraph in between the two you quoted from. The money for the purchase has already been appropriated by Congress and awarded to Intel. The awards didn't previously have this giant string attached where Intel gives stock in return. But now they do.

And it makes sense that Intel is spinning it as a generous investment from the gov't, but the gov't is spinning it as a free gift from Intel. Neither account really paints the full picture, but each one paints themselves as coming out ahead.

replies(6): >>44990485 #>>44990507 #>>44990605 #>>44990618 #>>44990987 #>>44991262 #
m4rtink ◴[] No.44990618[source]
Isn't that pretty bad, Darth Vader style changing of previously agreed on deals ?

Not sure how anyone can believe anything that was agreed will hold in such an environment. :P

replies(5): >>44990719 #>>44990759 #>>44992901 #>>44993568 #>>44994186 #
1. tonetegeatinst ◴[] No.44990719[source]
Yes, but its semiconductor industry so its complicated.

Intel got money via grants from the chip act and via other governments. Part of the reason they got that money was to help them build the chip fans in the USA and funding research and workforce in other nations. The fact Intel has claimed its slowing construction basically is a full 180° spin and will set them back in manufacturing ability.

Previous CEO strategy was focused on heavy investment in catching up on manufacturing ability. But once you get stuck on a node it becomes expensive to catch up.

New CEO is clearly trying to shed weight. They have let go of a significant % of workforce, stopped certain projects all together, and seem to be basically selling off parts of their technology and assets to keep cashflow positive.

Given the current CEO and his history and connections, plus the US government involvement it looks like a rocky situation.

replies(1): >>44991060 #
2. delfinom ◴[] No.44991060[source]
New CEO wants to keep the fabs though. It was the board chair pushing him to cut the fabs.