←back to thread

292 points kixelated | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.662s | source
1. otterley ◴[] No.44990376[source]
There's a whole "why should I care?" section in this breathless post that doesn't explain how Media over QUIC benefits either media publishers or end users - the two most important (perhaps the only important) parties involved in this exchange. So, why should I care?
replies(2): >>44990395 #>>44994213 #
2. kixelated ◴[] No.44990395[source]
My fault, I trying too hard to avoid rehashing previous blog posts: https://moq.dev/blog/replacing-webrtc/

And you're right that MoQ primarily benefits developers, not end users. It makes it a lot easier to scale and implement features; indirect benefits.

replies(1): >>44998622 #
3. perbu ◴[] No.44994213[source]
End-to-end (glass-to-glass) latency is substantially better. Mostly because the protocol isn't request/response any more.
4. koolala ◴[] No.44998622[source]
Your queue solution solves the SFU problem? The p2p quic ietf draft expired which stinks.