←back to thread

607 points givemeethekeys | 6 comments | | HN request time: 0.637s | source | bottom
Show context
cuttothechase ◴[] No.44990065[source]
Genuine question-

How does Govt picking winners and losers going to help?

Intel is no Too big to fail Bank. Why save Intel of all chip manufacturers? Wouldnt it be like 25 years too late, with Intel and its heydays !?

Would Govt now ensure parity by investing in "marquee" entities across different industrial domains?

replies(20): >>44990113 #>>44990135 #>>44990144 #>>44990162 #>>44990212 #>>44990285 #>>44990292 #>>44990294 #>>44990525 #>>44990551 #>>44990715 #>>44990722 #>>44991025 #>>44991107 #>>44991139 #>>44991204 #>>44991545 #>>44992843 #>>44993129 #>>45014149 #
miohtama ◴[] No.44990294[source]
There is only 1 winner and 1 loser: Intel.

It's the only chip manufacturer "left" in the US. The argument is national security: the US expects China to invade Taiwan and this will kill TSMC in the process.

Whether this will happen or not can be debated, but this is what the government expects.

replies(10): >>44990357 #>>44990361 #>>44990445 #>>44990780 #>>44990783 #>>44991062 #>>44991225 #>>44991269 #>>44991441 #>>44991698 #
1. Yoofie ◴[] No.44990361[source]
Texas Instruments and Microchip: Am I a joke to you?
replies(4): >>44990431 #>>44990461 #>>44990478 #>>45002819 #
2. kragen ◴[] No.44990431[source]
I'm surprised to see on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microchip_Technology that Microchip does in fact have fabs. I thought it was fabless! Its fabs are in the US, but the assembly and test facilities are all across the Pacific.
3. MobiusHorizons ◴[] No.44990461[source]
As far as I know none of them manufacture anything resembling a replacement for a Xeon, which is relevant to national security because those are uses in military applications.
replies(1): >>44992106 #
4. ukblewis ◴[] No.44990478[source]
Neither of them make high performance CPUs or GPUs
5. ◴[] No.44992106[source]
6. saagarjha ◴[] No.45002819[source]
Yes