←back to thread

365 points tanelpoder | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
IshKebab ◴[] No.44978604[source]
This is obviously a great move. I don't know why so many commenters here are against making things better. "Can't you just do <this slightly worse thing> already?". Well yes. But it's slightly worse.
replies(3): >>44978702 #>>44979899 #>>44986544 #
wasabi991011 ◴[] No.44979899[source]
I don't think being one word longer ("uvx ruff format" vs "uv format") counts as being is worse.

I think it is much worse to create a special case that obscures the actual formatter being run and how it is being run (is ruff now preinstalled, or is it downloaded and cached in the same way as other tools?)

replies(2): >>44980423 #>>44986882 #
1. wiseowise ◴[] No.44986882[source]
Let me rewrite your comment a little bit to make clearer what you’re saying.

> I don’t think additional complexity counts as being worse.

Yes, it does.