←back to thread

411 points donpott | 9 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source | bottom
Show context
nickdothutton ◴[] No.44983582[source]
Step 1, pass law.

Step 2, demand compliance.

Step 3, upon not hearing of compliance, levy fines.

Step 4, upon non payment of fines, declare in breach of (2).

Step 5, block site from UK using DNS, in the same manner as torrent sites etc.

5 was always the goal, 2 to 4 are largely just performative.

replies(13): >>44983768 #>>44983781 #>>44983897 #>>44984120 #>>44984248 #>>44985133 #>>44985729 #>>44985841 #>>44985859 #>>44986058 #>>44986633 #>>44988012 #>>44991247 #
sunshine-o ◴[] No.44984120[source]
This is the only power they have left.

The UK government has lost control of what happen in the physical world on their own island so now the bureaucrats play a fantasy game where they are gonna enforce their rules and dominion in their former colonies or the digital world.

replies(11): >>44985325 #>>44985367 #>>44985739 #>>44985860 #>>44986390 #>>44986462 #>>44986519 #>>44986980 #>>44988412 #>>44988528 #>>44991312 #
lokar ◴[] No.44985325[source]
While I disapprove of what the gov is doing here, I think it’s incorrect and unhelpful to put all the blame on them. AIUI, the UK is a democracy and these policies are generally supported by the voters.
replies(13): >>44985373 #>>44985589 #>>44985683 #>>44985789 #>>44985930 #>>44986196 #>>44986278 #>>44986352 #>>44986527 #>>44988134 #>>44988720 #>>44989241 #>>44989384 #
1. macinjosh ◴[] No.44985930[source]
Democracy is a form of government, not an ideology. Just because +50% of an electorate thinks something is OK, doesn't make it so.
replies(6): >>44986052 #>>44986054 #>>44986055 #>>44986117 #>>44986433 #>>44993162 #
2. lokar ◴[] No.44986052[source]
I agree. But it does matter if you want to do more then rant on the internet. If there is public support you need to educate people and change minds.
3. dpc050505 ◴[] No.44986054[source]
The form of government that applies democracy is rooted in the ideology that the majority knows best, which is the ideological version of democracy.
replies(2): >>44986151 #>>44992001 #
4. pegasus ◴[] No.44986055[source]
Parent was correctly pointing out that responsibility for whatever troubles the UK might be actually encountering should be distributed as democratically as its form of government actually is.
5. kelseyfrog ◴[] No.44986117[source]
Anything can be turned into an ideology, even democracy.
6. kibwen ◴[] No.44986151[source]
> rooted in the ideology that the majority knows best

Let's be careful here, the point in favor of democracy is not that the majority knows best, but rather if that people are to be subject to laws, then those same people should have an equal share in determining what those laws are. IOW, the point of democracy is to give the people what they deserve, and no more.

7. ◴[] No.44986433[source]
8. soraminazuki ◴[] No.44992001[source]
When people talk about democracies, they almost always refer to liberal democracies.

With liberal democracies, I believe it's more about self-determination or fair representation than who knows best. The point is to prevent tyranny, including majority tyranny.

There can be no liberal democracy without the protection of human rights and the of law.

9. rapidaneurism ◴[] No.44993162[source]
It's not 50% of the electorate, in the UK it is the plurality (second best plus 1 vote) of 50% of the electoral seats plus 1 seat. That gives absolute power.