←back to thread

DeepSeek-v3.1

(api-docs.deepseek.com)
776 points wertyk | 1 comments | 21 Aug 25 19:06 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
esafak ◴[21 Aug 25 20:12 UTC] No.44977474[source]▶
It seems behind Qwen3 235B 2507 Reasoning (which I like) and gpt-oss-120B: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/deepseek-v3-1-reasoning

Pricing: https://openrouter.ai/deepseek/deepseek-chat-v3.1

replies(2): >>44977550 #>>44981531 #
bigyabai ◴[21 Aug 25 20:18 UTC] No.44977550[source]▶
Those Qwen3 2507 models are the local creme-de-la-creme right now. If you've got any sort of GPU and ~32gb of RAM to play with, the A3B one is great for pair-programming tasks.
replies(4): >>44977707 #>>44978006 #>>44978062 #>>44979710 #
pdimitar ◴[21 Aug 25 20:32 UTC] No.44977707[source]▶
Do you happen to know if it can be run via an eGPU enclosure with f.ex. RTX 5090 inside, under Linux?

I'm considering buying a Linux workstation lately and I want it full AMD. But if I can just plug an NVIDIA card via an eGPU card for self-hosting LLMs then that would be amazing.

replies(3): >>44977887 #>>44977902 #>>44978104 #
gunalx ◴[21 Aug 25 20:48 UTC] No.44977887[source]▶
You would still need drivers and all the stuff difficult with nvidia in linux with a egpu. (Its not nessecarily terrible just suboptimal) Rather just add the second GPU in the Workstation, or just run the llm in your AMD GPU.
replies(1): >>44977904 #
pdimitar ◴[21 Aug 25 20:49 UTC] No.44977904[source]▶
Oh, we can run LLMs efficiently with AMD GPUs now? Pretty cool, I haven't been following, thank you.
replies(4): >>44978437 #>>44984429 #>>44984563 #>>44989107 #
1. Plasmoid2000ad ◴[22 Aug 25 13:39 UTC] No.44984563[source]▶
Yes - I'm running a LM Studio on windows on a 6800xt, and everything works more-or-less out of the box using always using Vulkan llama.cpp on the gpu I believe.

There's also ROCm. That's not working for me in LM Studio at the moment. I used that early last year to get some LLMs and stable diffusion running. As far as I can tell, it was faster before, but Vulkan implementations have caught up or something - so much the mucking about isn't often worth it. I believe ROCm is hit or miss for a lot of people, especially on windows.