AI tooling must be disclosed for contributions

Hot take: if you can't spot any issues in the code review it's either good code, code that needs further changes, or review was not done properly. I don't see how "I used LLMs" fit here, because it means nothing to the quality of the code submitted.

If such mention would mean increased reviewer attention, then every code review should include it.

Agreed -- this requirement feels less like an actually useful requirement and more a silly and performative one, which is trying to make some kind of commentary on AI use as a whole.

Spending at minimum five minutes would tell you why maintainers are implementing this change. It's because people using LLMs are spamming open source repos with fake issues, incredibly low quality but high effort to review PRs and shutting down the active communication process between reviewer and reviewee by not even understanding their own code.