←back to thread

AI tooling must be disclosed for contributions

(github.com)
728 points freetonik | 1 comments | 21 Aug 25 18:49 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
antirez ◴[21 Aug 25 20:48 UTC] No.44977896[source]▶
I'll cover in my YouTube why this is wrong but TLDR: you need to evaluate quality not process. AI can be used in diametrically different ways and the reason why this policy could be enforced is because it will be obvious if the code is produced via a solo flight of some AI agent. For the same reason that's not a policy that will improve anything.
replies(2): >>44981671 #>>44983097 #
1. nullc ◴[22 Aug 25 06:51 UTC] No.44981671[source]▶
If you look at how Quality Assurance works everywhere outside of software it is 99.9999% about having a process which produces quality by construction.