←back to thread

418 points speckx | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
varispeed ◴[] No.44974596[source]
The funniest part isn’t that AI hasn’t delivered profits. It’s that the only “value” most people got from LLMs was accidentally rediscovering what Google used to be before it turned into an ad-riddled casino.

Executives mistook that novelty for a business revolution. After years of degraded search, SEO spam, and “zero-click” answers, suddenly ChatGPT spat out a coherent paragraph and everyone thought: my god, the future is here. No - you just got a glimpse of 2009 Google with autocomplete.

So billions were lit on fire chasing “the sliced bread moment” of finally finding information again - except this time it’s wrapped in stochastic parroting, hallucinations, and a SaaS subscription. The real irony is that most of these AI pilots aren’t “failing to deliver ROI” - they’re faithfully mirroring the mediocrity of the organisations deploying them. Brittle workflows meet brittle models, and everyone acts surprised.

The pitch was always upside-down. These things don’t think, don’t learn, don’t adapt. They remix. At best they’re productivity duct tape for bored middle managers. At worst they’re a trillion-dollar hallucination engine being sold as “strategy.”

The MIT study basically confirms what was obvious: if you expect parrots to run your company, you get birdshite for returns.

replies(2): >>44977139 #>>44979278 #
1. kmarc ◴[] No.44979278[source]
While you are being downvoted here, I would like to express how much I liked how this thought summarized some of the pain points I have to deal with: (regardless of AI):

> they’re faithfully mirroring the mediocrity of the organisation

This is happening with to technologies / tools / etc...