←back to thread

365 points tanelpoder | 5 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
calmbonsai ◴[] No.44978208[source]
I see zero need for this given that excellent time-testing code formatting tooling options are already available.

This smacks of feature-creep and I won't be incorporating it into any pipelines for the foreseeable future.

replies(2): >>44978667 #>>44978691 #
1. nikisweeting ◴[] No.44978667[source]
You realize this is just a shortcut for one of those "time-tested" options, right? ruff format is already widely used.
replies(1): >>44979645 #
2. calmbonsai ◴[] No.44979645[source]
But why bundle? It makes zero design sense to me.
replies(1): >>44979999 #
3. nikisweeting ◴[] No.44979999[source]
go fmt, cargo fmt, deno fmt, dart format, etc. it's hardly a new trend to ship a formatter with an all-in-one package manager for a language. It's convenient for new projects to not have to set up an additional dependency.
replies(1): >>44980945 #
4. RossBencina ◴[] No.44980945{3}[source]
I'm not clear on this, but does it not also setup a backward dependency between the new project and uv?
replies(1): >>44981853 #
5. nikisweeting ◴[] No.44981853{4}[source]
Oh no I would hate to have to depend on my package manager and build system