←back to thread

418 points speckx | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
jawns ◴[] No.44974805[source]
Full disclosure: I'm currently in a leadership role on an AI engineering team, so it's in my best interest for AI to be perceived as driving value.

Here's a relatively straightforward application of AI that is set to save my company millions of dollars annually.

We operate large call centers, and agents were previously spending 3-5 minutes after each call writing manual summaries of the calls.

We recently switched to using AI to transcribe and write these summaries. Not only are the summaries better than those produced by our human agents, they also free up the human agents to do higher-value work.

It's not sexy. It's not going to replace anyone's job. But it's a huge, measurable efficiency gain.

replies(39): >>44974847 #>>44974853 #>>44974860 #>>44974865 #>>44974867 #>>44974868 #>>44974869 #>>44974874 #>>44974876 #>>44974877 #>>44974901 #>>44974905 #>>44974906 #>>44974907 #>>44974929 #>>44974933 #>>44974951 #>>44974977 #>>44974989 #>>44975016 #>>44975021 #>>44975040 #>>44975093 #>>44975126 #>>44975142 #>>44975193 #>>44975225 #>>44975251 #>>44975268 #>>44975271 #>>44975292 #>>44975458 #>>44975509 #>>44975544 #>>44975548 #>>44975622 #>>44975923 #>>44976668 #>>44977281 #
Shank ◴[] No.44974907[source]
Who reads the summaries? Are they even useful to begin with? Or did this just save everyone 3-5 minutes of meaningless work?
replies(2): >>44974979 #>>44975119 #
vosper ◴[] No.44974979[source]
AI reads them and identifies trends and patterns, or answers questions from PMs or others?
replies(1): >>44976538 #
1. cube00 ◴[] No.44976538[source]
AI writes inaccurate summaries and then consumes its own slop so it can hallucinate the answer to the PM's questions after misreading said slop.

Much like dubbing a video tape multiple times, it's going to get worse as you add more layers text predictors.