←back to thread

308 points ndsipa_pomu | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.211s | source
Show context
guywithahat[dead post] ◴[] No.44975467[source]
[flagged]
blackguardx ◴[] No.44975590[source]
I grew up in the rust belt. I've never heard of anyone leaving to "escape unions" but rather there just being not many jobs, lots of historic pollution to deal with, and a poor future economic outlook.

Why were unions specifically to blame for your family leaving?

replies(2): >>44975908 #>>44976160 #
1. JumpCrisscross ◴[] No.44975908[source]
> never heard of anyone leaving to "escape unions" but rather there just being not many jobs

Union versus non-union is a quality versus quantity problem. Unions restrict the labour pool to increase wages. When that protects specialisation, it increases productivity. When it artificially constrains the labour pool, it decreases it.

A unionised job market showing unemployment (or underemployment) is usually an indication of the latter.