←back to thread

418 points speckx | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
chriskanan ◴[] No.44975610[source]
Where is the actual paper that makes these claims? I'm seeing this story repeated all over today, but the link doesn't actually seem to go to the study.

I am not going to trust it without actually going over the paper.

Even then, if it isn't peer-reviewed and properly vetted, I still wouldn't necessarily trust it. The MIT study on AI's impact on scientific discovery that made a big splash a year ago was fraudulent even though it was peer reviewed (so I'd really like to know about the veracity of the data): https://www.ndtv.com/science/mit-retracts-popular-study-clai...

replies(1): >>44975739 #
1. Workaccount2 ◴[] No.44975739[source]
An alternative headline is "90% of employees report using LLMs regularly"

The story is a "Pick your narrative" one.

https://mlq.ai/media/quarterly_decks/v0.1_State_of_AI_in_Bus...