95% of Companies See 'Zero Return' on $30B Generative AI Spend

Full disclosure: I'm currently in a leadership role on an AI engineering team, so it's in my best interest for AI to be perceived as driving value.

Here's a relatively straightforward application of AI that is set to save my company millions of dollars annually.

We operate large call centers, and agents were previously spending 3-5 minutes after each call writing manual summaries of the calls.

We recently switched to using AI to transcribe and write these summaries. Not only are the summaries better than those produced by our human agents, they also free up the human agents to do higher-value work.

It's not sexy. It's not going to replace anyone's job. But it's a huge, measurable efficiency gain.

> it's a huge, measurable efficiency gain.

> It's not going to replace anyone's job

Mechanically, more efficiency means less people required for the same output.

I understand there is no evidence that any other sentence can be written about jobs. Still, you should put more text in between those two sentences. Reading them so close together creates audible dissonance.

You're not accounting for teams already being understaffed and overtasked in many situations, with some AI tools allowing people to get back to doing their jobs. We aren't expecting significant headcount changes, but we are expecting significant performance and quality improvements for the resources we have.