←back to thread

1163 points DaveZale | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
Nurbek-F ◴[] No.44764571[source]
Someone has to put a chart near it, describing the decline in driving in the city. When you're limited to 30kmh, you might as well get a scooter...
replies(8): >>44765647 #>>44765653 #>>44766371 #>>44770865 #>>44770955 #>>44771080 #>>44771189 #>>44771304 #
thomascountz ◴[] No.44765653[source]
A 30 km/h limit and decline in driving means zero people have to die. If enforcing scooters meant zero people have to die, I'm not sure what the objection is, truly.
replies(4): >>44770622 #>>44770733 #>>44770771 #>>44770779 #
mattlondon ◴[] No.44770733[source]
Scooters kill people too (often the drivers themselves but not always).

The problem with escooters is that basically any accident is "bad" since you have no protection while you toodle along at 15.5mph. Not just slamming into the ground, but into street furniture, trees, building, bikes - you name it. A helmet (which no one wears) is not going to help you if you wrap your abdomen around a solid metal bench at 15.5mph. The real world has a lot of hard sticky-out bits (and perhaps ironically cars don't due to crash testing rules, so I guess crash I to a stationary car is your best bet)

It's a bloodbath in London.

replies(3): >>44771398 #>>44772143 #>>44775244 #
1. 7952 ◴[] No.44775244[source]
That is exactly the danger a pedestrian faces when a car drives into them. At least with a scooter the driver takes on more of the risk and has more skin in the game.