←back to thread

1163 points DaveZale | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
mzmzmzm ◴[] No.44771148[source]
At the same time NYC and Toronto, we are removing protected bike lanes. In North America the acceptable amount of lives per year to sacrifice for a little convenience for drivers is above zero, and apparently rising.
replies(9): >>44771213 #>>44771385 #>>44771689 #>>44771694 #>>44771702 #>>44771763 #>>44772166 #>>44772256 #>>44774008 #
cyberax[dead post] ◴[] No.44771694[source]
[flagged]
1. cosmic_cheese ◴[] No.44771758[source]
I might say that of unprotected bike lanes, but how are well protected lanes a detriment?

As a driver and biker alike I’d much prefer there to be a thick barrier between the cyclist and traffic. It reduces the chances of drivers bumping into or hitting cyclists and ensures that the cyclists cannot unexpectedly swerve into traffic.