←back to thread

1163 points DaveZale | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
Nurbek-F ◴[] No.44764571[source]
Someone has to put a chart near it, describing the decline in driving in the city. When you're limited to 30kmh, you might as well get a scooter...
replies(8): >>44765647 #>>44765653 #>>44766371 #>>44770865 #>>44770955 #>>44771080 #>>44771189 #>>44771304 #
thomascountz ◴[] No.44765653[source]
A 30 km/h limit and decline in driving means zero people have to die. If enforcing scooters meant zero people have to die, I'm not sure what the objection is, truly.
replies(4): >>44770622 #>>44770733 #>>44770771 #>>44770779 #
1. hsdvw ◴[] No.44770779[source]
Maybe enforce pedestrian crossings instead. Zero deaths without annoying anybody.
replies(3): >>44770920 #>>44771145 #>>44774599 #
2. 9dev ◴[] No.44770920[source]
They had pedestrian crossings already, and that was not the deciding factor. It was the speed limit that kept people alive.

If people like you getting annoyed by having to drive slower is the price for just one person not dying in traffic, that’s already a win in my book.

3. perching_aix ◴[] No.44771145[source]
Do you think people rightfully crossing crosswalks never get hit, or do you include the cars in the equation too? What about every other type traffic accident that could be prevented from being fatal by just lowering the speed?
4. zahlman ◴[] No.44774599[source]
It takes almost no effort to find stories like https://globalnews.ca/news/10986468/robie-street-halifax-ped... .

(For reference, Halifax, Nova Scotia is maybe a quarter of the size of Helsinki.)