←back to thread

280 points dargscisyhp | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.429s | source
Show context
Almondsetat ◴[] No.44765722[source]
It's really telling when an invaluable intellectual powerhouse specialized in a non politicized field gets its funds taken away because of politics

Edit:

This is a comment about the administration, not Tao.

replies(3): >>44765781 #>>44766016 #>>44766115 #
ekianjo ◴[] No.44765781[source]
thats why they should refrain from engaging in politics in the first place. the day the wind changes you lose.
replies(5): >>44765901 #>>44765915 #>>44765937 #>>44766011 #>>44766303 #
kzrdude ◴[] No.44765901[source]
Then it's maybe not a free country anymore if you have to think about how your actions are perceived by the president in power at every step.
replies(3): >>44765936 #>>44766039 #>>44766233 #
bsaul ◴[] No.44766039[source]
i agree with you, but i think it's been the case in the US for the past 15 years already. The only difference is trump pushing toward different issues than biden.
replies(2): >>44766204 #>>44766232 #
kergonath ◴[] No.44766232[source]
Which president did anything like this anywhere close to that scale? You are getting confused by propaganda.
replies(1): >>44766329 #
1. bsaul ◴[] No.44766329[source]
It was much less a one-man thing, i agree. Looking at the US debates from europe however, I have the feeling monolithic thinking was very much in place in academia on a wide range of topics (gender theory, climate change, israel support, vaccine mandate, etc).

And not just academia if i look at zuckerberg's testimony over federal government censoring people arbitrarily on the platforms.

replies(1): >>44767120 #
2. ◴[] No.44767120[source]