←back to thread

155 points samuell | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
bananapub ◴[] No.44746678[source]
[2022]
replies(1): >>44747045 #
Jtsummers ◴[] No.44747045[source]
It's an ongoing project, specifying a date here wouldn't make much sense.
replies(1): >>44747717 #
bananapub ◴[] No.44747717[source]
is there any news? the website has no information and doesn't really highlight anything other than their launch at a conference in 2022.
replies(2): >>44747945 #>>44748333 #
1. Jtsummers ◴[] No.44748333[source]
Yes. pjmlp answered here, but before he posted his reply, nxobject commented with the roadmap which covers 2025 and beyond:

https://docs.carbon-lang.dev/docs/project/roadmap.html

Even on the submitted page, the oldest you could claim it represents is 2024. But I stand by my earlier remark. When linking to an active project's documentation or home page, unless it's to a specifically dated version of it, a date doesn't make sense. For instance, linking to something specific in Python 2.6 documentation, maybe add a date. But if it's just to python.org, it would be absurd to tag it with [1991].