←back to thread

Carbon Language: An experimental successor to C++

(docs.carbon-lang.dev)
155 points samuell | 1 comments | 31 Jul 25 14:23 UTC | HN request time: 0.206s | source
Show context
nxobject ◴[31 Jul 25 16:14 UTC] No.44747122[source]▶
If you've seen this before, it's worth looking at the 2025 roadmap – it's long-term work, a full safety story hasn't been quite figured out (TBD end 2025), and 0.1 is TBD end 2026. About the pace of Rust, although without the active forum that Rust had in its early days.

https://docs.carbon-lang.dev/docs/project/roadmap.html

What _is_ interesting is that I get the impression that Carbon is being workshopped with the C++ community, rather than the wider PLT community -- I worry that they won't benefit from the broader perspectives that'll help it avoid well-known warts elsewhere.

replies(5): >>44747312 #>>44748456 #>>44748942 #>>44749111 #>>44753122 #
1. ryanobjc ◴[31 Jul 25 16:34 UTC] No.44747312[source]▶
I think there are parallels with functional languages on the JVM. The parts that are the worst are the parts that were built for maximum interoperability. Not to mention that the JVM forces classes on you at the deepest opcode levels.

Compatibility with C++ is fine, but so far it seems carbon's safety story is entirely a wishlist rather than anything yet. Seems like Carbon might be a more of a place to demonstrate features for C++ committees than a real language?

Personally I have hand it up to here with lousy programmingn languages that make it easy for me to write bugs.