←back to thread

128 points taylorlunt | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
zwnow ◴[] No.44735172[source]
It also caused the "Golden Age of Programming". It's only been a golden age because of high salaries for relatively low effort. So if their needs change, obviously the industry changes. This article has nothing to say really.
replies(4): >>44735252 #>>44735280 #>>44735965 #>>44738526 #
rkozik1989 ◴[] No.44735280[source]
>It's only been a golden age because of high salaries for relatively low effort.

Money is how you define a Golden Age of Programming? I consider the late 1990s and early 2000s more of a Golden Age, and my reasons for it have nothing to do with making money. The time was of Golden Age because that's when programming became more accessible to the masses. Yes it wasn't without its fault, namely with regards to cyber security, but people all of the world suddenly were able to learn how to code and all the needed was an Internet connection.

Frankly, all this nonsense about money, total compensation, etc. is the cancer that killed programming.

replies(8): >>44735330 #>>44735355 #>>44735432 #>>44735477 #>>44735515 #>>44735939 #>>44736044 #>>44736521 #
afpx ◴[] No.44735939[source]
Of all the impressive software developers I had pleasure to meet before 2012, I never met one who did it for money. They loved their work, the craft, the science, and sheer joy of the creative process. That culture ended quickly pretty around 2012-15, but I never figured out why.
replies(3): >>44736158 #>>44736205 #>>44737010 #
1. surgical_fire ◴[] No.44736158[source]
People figured out that their passion was being exploited by some very rich and greedy people for obscene amounts of money.

If you can't fight it, you can at least profit from it too.