←back to thread

128 points taylorlunt | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.213s | source
Show context
zwnow ◴[] No.44735172[source]
It also caused the "Golden Age of Programming". It's only been a golden age because of high salaries for relatively low effort. So if their needs change, obviously the industry changes. This article has nothing to say really.
replies(4): >>44735252 #>>44735280 #>>44735965 #>>44738526 #
rkozik1989 ◴[] No.44735280[source]
>It's only been a golden age because of high salaries for relatively low effort.

Money is how you define a Golden Age of Programming? I consider the late 1990s and early 2000s more of a Golden Age, and my reasons for it have nothing to do with making money. The time was of Golden Age because that's when programming became more accessible to the masses. Yes it wasn't without its fault, namely with regards to cyber security, but people all of the world suddenly were able to learn how to code and all the needed was an Internet connection.

Frankly, all this nonsense about money, total compensation, etc. is the cancer that killed programming.

replies(8): >>44735330 #>>44735355 #>>44735432 #>>44735477 #>>44735515 #>>44735939 #>>44736044 #>>44736521 #
1. hecanjog ◴[] No.44735515[source]
This was my experience, too. During that period there were free tools and accessible information for learning, search was useful and the excitement was about making things. Not products to sell, interesting software to use. Then it all got paved over into a shopping mall. Those tools and information are still around. (If you look hard enough past the edges of the shopping mall.) I just spent my morning before work once again working on free software, but the mainstream culture of programming is depressing to me now.