←back to thread

284 points borski | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
MontyCarloHall ◴[] No.44685710[source]
Isn't this just part of the broader trend of CS departments switching away from teaching computer science to teaching computer engineering, which in turn is part of the more general trend of colleges becoming more vocational?

LISP dialects like Scheme are excellent for teaching pure computer science because they are the closest thing to executing lambda calculus expressions. Whereas Python is excellent for teaching applied computer engineering, because it's essentially executable pseudocode for imperative languages, and imperative languages are the most common language a computer engineer encounters in the real world.

replies(18): >>44685819 #>>44685842 #>>44685939 #>>44686019 #>>44686088 #>>44686154 #>>44686222 #>>44686308 #>>44686321 #>>44686533 #>>44686596 #>>44686808 #>>44687195 #>>44687197 #>>44688209 #>>44688239 #>>44688473 #>>44688736 #
souldzin ◴[] No.44685939[source]
Are functional languages more computer science than imperative languages?
replies(2): >>44685997 #>>44690497 #
1. dehrmann ◴[] No.44690497[source]
It's one way of modelling the broad notion an algorithm, but it isn't the only one, and it's odd to treat it as the one true expression of computer science when essentially all modern computing follows a different model.