Why would you want to use a closed source OS controlled by a corporation with a past as checkered as Microsoft's?
Why would you want to use a closed source OS controlled by a corporation with a past as checkered as Microsoft's?
The only game that didn't work out of the box for me was Path of Exile 2.
    DRI_PRIME=1 WINEDLLOVERRIDES="xaudio2_7=n,b" PULSE_LATENCY_MSEC=90 %command%
Or maybe it’s this one that the next user reported…    DXIL_SPIRV_CONFIG=wmma_fp8_hack FSR4_UPGRADE=1 game-performance %command%
I personally don’t want to have to do stuff like that to get them to work.There are very few games that run "better" on Linux, and that too only on specific benchmarks and after a lot of tweaks and hacks. Nvidia is a lost cause, many devices, parts and peripherals don't bother providing Linux driver support, and HDR & VRR have either bog-standard implementations or are straight-up unsupported. There is no way any current nontrivial game runs better out-of-the-box on any Linux distro for a layman than on Windows on most retail "gaming" computers.
People will post their tinker steps for everything. It's often just to disable the steam overlay, or inject their own overlay, or whatever they think gets them an extra 2 fps. It's linux and people love to configure it their way, but honestly steam/proton handles it automatically 99% of the time.
My point is it isn't a universal truth that everybody currently running 10 can just switch to linux/proton now and it is seamless. Really depends on what you run and your hardware, as with everything linux.
I also hack some games with dll injection and I don't know how I'm going to get that working with proton, maybe it works, maybe it doesn't.